What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us 
, Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story 
& flickr for separating photos. 
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for separating photos.
What I've been thinking about for awhile and wanted to discuss with you is weather or not paging is the best experience for a user, and if not what other possibilities could be applied.
less mouse clicks + less waiting time + less finding a link time ( I mean the next link or the numbers ) = better user experience so I got another possibility that has none of the above the other possibility simply is not using paging and just leave all the data as it is in one page, some body just asked what are you crazy what if I got 1000000000 items like the search results of anything, yes but remember that those items will load from up to down that means that the showed part of the page which is the most upper part will be filled first immediately then the scroll bar will begin to get smaller indicating that the web page is vertically getting longer, if you are going to examine one by one I'm sure your examination time to every item will be a lot less than it's loading time, another one just asked "But now I will have to read the page before it's completely loaded" and why not what prevent you of reading a page while it's still loading in fact most of the users do that and maybe even click on a link before the page is fully loaded, another question "But it might download unnecessary content if I left the web page opened" the most probability is that the user will click on a link or just enter in a new URL or close the browser, but if he didn't and leave it opened yes sure that might be a problem because it will affect the net speed that might be needed in other browsers windows or any open downloads and if the net is used by a network of computers not only single PC it will decrease the net speed of the whole network it will not really affect if the content is text but if it's a list of photos like in flickr it will definitely affect, and this is not a problem for the user only it's a bigger problem for the page owner as it will cost him a lot of extra unnecessary bandwidth.
So what to do now ? I suggest adding the option No paging beside the options that we often see Show 10, 25, 50, 100 in a page let it be show 10, 25, 50, 100, all in a page, let the option all be the default if the content is text and let the option be 25 or 50 if the content is images according to the size of images if they are high resolution let it be 25 or 10 of low let it be 50 etc...
Now I opened all the possibilities infornt of you and showed you the possibilities and the advantages and effects infront of you, you choose what option you will do.
What I mean by paging is the separation of content on more than 1 page after it exceeds a specific amount, as in Google search for example search for anything to find for example 1000 results actually they are over 1000000000 but to simplify our calculations let's say 1000, those results will be separated on 100 pages 10 results per page arranged from the most relevant to least.
It's also used in other types of contents for example in del.icio.us , Wired News for separating long stories also maybe it's made to show more ads during a story & flickr for se